Volume is not semantic diversity
747,958 repeated record-level mapping claims collapse into only 15 unique Semantic Mapping Units. TWIRX reports both numbers because they answer different questions.
Corpus impact
How many packets and frames would a mapping decision affect?
Semantic diversity
How many distinct native-field-to-concept judgments actually require review?
Current semantic review state
- Source families
- 2
- Unique mapping units
- 15
- Signed decisions
- 0
- Reviewed hard negatives
- 0
| Native schemas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Native fields | 15 |
| Candidate semantic concepts | 12 |
| Candidate frame roles | 14 |
| Mapping relation | unresolved |
| Admission status | pending |
“Unresolved” describes the semantic relation. “Pending” describes human admission. They are deliberately separate dimensions.
The Workbench produces review evidence, not automatic canon
- Explore native structureSchema, field, path, type, source family, sample values and neighboring fields.
- Inspect candidate meaningConcept, frame role, examples, counterexamples and affected packet/frame counts.
- Choose an actionAccept, reject, defer or contextual—with a separate exact, close, broad, narrow, contextual or unresolved relation.
- Record reasons and contextReason codes and explicit conditions prevent a local equivalence from becoming universal.
- Sign and versionAn external review key binds reviewer identity, time, prior decision and semantic diff.
- Export eligible training evidenceOnly verified signed decisions enter the training ledger.
Competency includes knowing what cannot be concluded
Opportunity
6 positive and negative cases pass. Personalized eligibility, current-open state and ranking stay unresolved when evidence is insufficient.
World State
6 cases pass. Causality, cross-series comparability and missing methodology are not inferred from a numeric observation.
Total competency failures: 0. Passing authored constraints does not approve any pending mapping unit.
What models may and may not do
May propose
- Concept candidates
- Frame roles
- Potential relations
- Ambiguity and abstention
- High-impact review ordering
May not establish
- Mapping admission
- Source or publisher authority
- Identity equivalence
- Policy permission
- Canonical ontology state